For environmental
occupational health safe
and responsible use

Science and publications

Report of an IPCS Working Group Meeting on the Reduction of Asbestos in the Environment

Internal Technical Report
(Rome, Italy, 12-16 December 1988)

1.  Introduction 
  1.1 - Objectives 
  1.2 - Approach 
  1.3 - Evaluation of health risks - environmental exposure to asbestos

2.  Summary of Environmental Health Criteria (EHC) No. 53 
  2.1 - Identity, physical and chemical properties, methods of sampling and analysis 
  2.2 - Sources of occupational and environmental exposure 
  2.3 - Environmental levels and exposure 
  2.4 - Toxicological effects on animals 
  2.5 - Effects on man 
  2.6 - Evaluation of health risks

3.  Asbestos in public buildings, including aspects of their construction,renovation and demolition

4.  Asbestos in the production, maintenance and use of vehicles 
  4.11 - Occupational risks 
  4.2 - Pollution of the general environment

5.  Transportation, storage, and disposal of asbestos

6.  Conclusions and recommendations 
  6.1 - Conclusions 
  6.2 - General recommendations 
  6.3 - Specific recommendations: 
     6.3.1 - Asbestos in public buildings 
     6.3.2 - Asbestos waste disposal 
     6.3.3 - Friction materials

(Annexes are not included in this summary)

ANNEX I - Asbestos Risk in Buildings and Building Maintenance, Dr. Garry J. Burdett

ANNEX II - Reducing Exposures to Asbestos in the United States, Ms Susan Vogt

ANNEX III - Asbestos Risk in Vehicle Manufacture, Maintenance, and Repair, Professor Fedor Valic

ANNEX IV - Management of Asbestos Waste, Collection, Transportation, Storage and Disposal, Mr. Sims Roy

ANNEX V - Industry's Views on the Needs and Feasibility of Environmental Asbestos Reduction, Sir Neville Stack

International Program on Chemical Safety (IPCS), Joint sponsorship of United Nations Environment Programme, International Labour Organisation, World Health Organisation



Professor V. Silano opened the meeting and welcomed the participants on behalf of the Ministry of the Environment, Italy. Professor G. Donelli greeted participants on behalf of the host institute (Instituto Superiore di Sanità), and Professor F. Valic addressed the meeting on behalf of the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS).

1.1 Objectives

The objectives of the meeting were to review documentation and experience relating to the presence of asbestos in the environment resulting from:

a) the construction, maintenance, and demolition of buildings, including school buildings;
b) the use of asbestos in the construction, maintenance and use of vehicles;
c) collection, transportation, storage and disposal of asbestos-containing waste.
Occupational exposure was not considered, except in relation to objective b).

1.2 Approach

1) To discuss methods and approaches for the reduction of asbestos in the environment.
2) To consider data relevant to the identified approaches and to outline associated priorities.
3) To propose the identified approaches in the form of general guidelines.

For the application of guidelines and recommendations developed by the Working Group, it is important that each country assess their relevance in the light of other local priorities in health protection. Economic, technical and manpower constraints also need careful consideration, these factors being particularly important in developing countries.

The Working Group reviewed five background papers prepared for the meeting:

€  Asbestos Risk in Buildings and Building Maintenance, G. Burdett, United Kingdom

€  Reducing Exposure to Asbestos in the United States, S. Vogt, USA

€  Asbestos Risk in Vehicle Manufacture, Maintenance and Repair, F. Valic, Yugoslavia

€  Background Information on Management of Asbestos Waste Collection, Transportation, Storage and Disposal, S. Roy, USA

€  Industry's Views on the Needs and Feasibility of Environmental Asbestos Reduction, N. Stack, Asbestos International Association, U.K.

Although several countries have well-defined policies on the control of environmental exposure to asbestos, only that of the USA was described in the background documents provided to the Working Group.


1.3 Evaluation of health risks - environmental exposure to asbestos

While it was considered inappropriate to accept unconditionally the full report of the IPCS Environmental Health Criteria (EHC) monograph 53: Asbestos and Other Natural Mineral Fibres, since it reflected the consensus of a different panel of experts, the summary of this monograph was felt to be a relevant basis for the development of guidelines and recommendations concerning environmental exposure.

The Working Group recognized differences in interpretation of the available data as a basis for evaluation of the risks to health associated with exposure to asbestos in the environment. In particular, there were different opinions on the adequacy of the data concerning:

€  variations in the potency of different fibre types (chrysotile and amphiboles) and sizes;

€  variations in the risks in different industries;

€  the validity of the use, for quantitative risk estimation, of linear dose-response models based on cumulative exposure.

However, the Working Group decided that it was possible to develop recommendations and guidelines on the reduction of asbestos in the environment while acknowledging the lack of consensus on these aspects.



(From: Environmental Health Criteria 53 - Asbestos and Other Natural and Mineral Fibres, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1986, 194 pp.)

2.1 Identity, physical and chemical properties, methods of sampling and analysis

The commercial term asbestos refers to a group of fibrous serpentine and amphibole minerals that have high tensile strength, conduct heat poorly, and are relatively resistant to chemical attack. The principal varieties of asbestos used in commerce are chrysotile, a serpentine mineral, and crocidolite and amosite, both of which are amphiboles. Anthophyllite, tremolite and actinolite asbestos are also amphiboles, but they are rare, and the commercial exploitation of anthophyllite asbestos has been discontinued. Other natural mineral fibres that may be considered potentially hazardous because of their physical and chemical properties are erionite, wollastonite, attapulgite and sepiolite.

Chrysotile fibres consist of aggregates of long, thin, flexible fibrils that resemble scrolls or cylinders. The dimensions of individual chrysotile fibres depend on the extent to which the sample has been manipulated. Amphibole fibres generally tend to be straight and splintery. Crocidolite fibrils are shorter with a smaller diameter than other amphibole fibrils, but they are not as narrow as fibrils of chrysotile. Amosite fibrils are larger in diameter than those of both crocidolite and chrysotile. Respirable fractions of asbestos dust vary according to fibre type and manipulation.

Several methods involving optical phase contrast microscopy have been developed for determining levels of asbestos fibres in the air of workplaces. Only fibres over 5um in length with an aspect ratio > 3:1 and a diameter of less than 3 um are counted. Thus, the resulting fibre count can be regarded only as an index of actual numbers of fibres present in the sample (fibres with diameters less than the resolution of the light microscope are not included in this essay). Fibres with diameters smaller than approximately 0.25 um cannot be seen by light microscopy, and an electron microscope is necessary for counting and identifying these fibres. Electron microscopes that are equipped with auxiliary equipment can provide information on both structure and elemental composition.

The results of analysis using light microscopy can be compared with those using transmission or scanning electron microscopy, but only if the same counting criteria are used.


2.2 Sources of occupational and environmental exposure

Asbestos is widely distributed in the earth's crust. Chrysotile, which accounts for more than 95% of the world asbestos trade, occurs in virtually all serpentine rocks. The remainder consists of the amphiboles (amosite and crocidolite). Chrysotile deposits are currently exploited in more than 40 countries; most of these reserves are found in southern Africa, Canada, China and the USSR. There are, reportedly, thousands of commercial and industrial applications of asbestos.

Dissemination of asbestos and other mineral fibres from natural deposits may be a source of exposure for the general population. Unfortunately, few quantitative data are available. Most of the asbestos present in the atmosphere and ambient water probably results from the mining, milling and manufacture of asbestos or from the deterioration or breakage of asbestos-containing materials.

2.3 Environmental levels and exposures

Asbestos is ubiquitous in the environment because of its extensive industrial use and the dissemination of fibres from natural sources. Available data using currently accepted methods of sampling and analysis indicate that fibre levels (fibres <5 µm in length) at remote rural locations are generally below the detection limit (less than 1 fibre/litre), while those in urban air range from <1 to 10 fibres / litre or occasionally higher. Airborne levels in residential areas in the vicinity of industrial sources have been found to be within the range of those in urban areas or occasionally slightly higher. Non-occupational indoor levels are generally within the range found in the ambient air. Occupational exposure levels vary depending on the effectiveness of dust-control measures; they may be up to several hundred fibres/ml in industry or mines without, or with only poor, dust control, but are generally well below 2 fibres / ml in modern industry.

Reported concentrations in drinking water range up to 200 x 10 6 fibres/litre (all fibre lengths).


2.4 Toxicological effects on animals

Fibrosis in many animal species, and bronchial carcinomas and pleural mesotheliomas in the rat, have been observed following inhalation of both chrysotile and amphibole asbestos. In these studies, there were no consistent increases in tumour incidence at other sites, and there is no convincing evidence that ingested asbestos is carcinogenic in animals. Data from the injection / implementation studies have shown that shorter asbestos fibres are less fibrogenic and carcinogenic.

The length, diameter and chemical composition of fibres are important determinants of their deposition, clearance and translocation within the body. Available data also indicate that the potential of fibres to induce mesotheliomas following intrapleural or intraperitoneal injection in animal species is mainly a function of fibre length and diameter; in general, fibres with a maximum carcinogenic potency have been reported to be longer than 8 µm and less than 1.5 µm in diameter.

2.5 Effects on man

Epidemiological studies, mainly on occupational groups, have established that all types of asbestos fibres are associated with diffuse pulmonary fibrosis (asbestosis), bronchial carcinoma, and primary malignant tumours of the pleura and peritoneum (mesothelioma). That asbestos causes cancers at other sites is less well established. Gastrointestinal and laryngeal cancer are possible, but the causal relationship with asbestos exposure has not yet been firmly established; there is no substantial supporting evidence for cancer at other sites. Asbestos exposure may cause visceral and parietal pleural changes.

Cigarette smoking increases the asbestosis mortality and the risk of lung cancer in persons exposed to asbestos but not the risk of mesothelioma. Generally, cases of malignant mesothelioma are rapidly fatal. The observed incidence of these tumours, which was low until about 30 years ago, has been increasing rapidly in males in industrial countries. As asbestos-related mesothelioma became more widely accepted and known to pathologists in western countries, reports of mesothelioma increased. The incidence of mesothelioma prior to, e.g. 1960, is not known. Mesotheliomas have seldom followed exposure to chrysotile asbestos only. Most, but not all, cases of mesothelioma have a history of occupational exposure to amphibole asbestos, principally crocidolite, either alone or in amphibole-chrysotile mixtures.

There is strong evidence that one non-asbestos fibrous mineral (erionite) is carcinogenic in man. This fibrous zeolite is likely to be the cause of localized endemic mesothelioma in Turkey.

Non-malignant thickening of the visceral pleura is frequently associated with asbestosis. Thickening of the parietal pleura, sometimes with calcification, may occur in the absence of detectable asbestosis. It is seen in those occupationally exposed to asbestos and also occurs endemically in a number of countries, but the causes have not been fully established. Tremolite fibre has been implicated as an etiological agent in some regions.


2.6 Evaluation of health risks

At present, past exposure to asbestos has not been sufficiently well defined to make an accurate assessment of the risks from future levels of exposure, which are likely to be low.

A simple risk assessment is not possible for asbestos. In making an assessment, the emphasis is placed on the incidence of lung cancer and mesothelioma, the principal hazards. Two approaches are possible, one based on a comparative and qualitative evaluation of the literature (qualitative assessment), the other based on an underlying mathematical model to link fibre exposure to the incidence of cancer (quantitative assessment). Attempts to derive the mathematical model have had limited success. Data from several studies support a linear relationship with cumulative dose for lung cancer and an exponential relationship with time since first exposure for mesothelioma. However, the derived "coefficients" within these equations cover a wide range of values from zero upwards. This numerical variability reflects the uncertainty of many factors including historical concentration measurements, fibre size distributions associated with a given fibre level and variations in the potency of different fibre types. Furthermore, smoking habits are rarely well defined in relation to bronchial cancer. The variability may also reflect uncertainty in the validity of the models. These factors have complicated the quantitative extrapolation of the risk of developing these diseases to levels of exposure such as those in the general environment, which are orders of magnitude below levels of exposure in the populations from which the estimates have been derived.

The following conclusions can be drawn on the basis of qualitative assessment:

(a) Among occupational groups, exposure to asbestos poses a health hazard that may result in asbestosis, lung cancer and mesothelioma. The incidence of these diseases is related to fibre type, fibre dose, and industrial processing. Adequate control measures should significantly reduce these risks.

(b) In para-occupational groups, including persons with household contact, those living in the vicinity of asbestos-producing and using plants, and others, the risks of mesothelioma and lung cancer are generally much lower than for occupational groups. The risk of asbestosis is very low. These risks are being further reduced as a result of improved control practices.

(c) In the general population, the risks of mesothelioma and lung cancer, attributable to asbestos cannot be quantified reliably and are probably undetectably low. Cigarette smoking is the major etiological factor in the production of lung cancer in the general population. The risk of asbestosis is virtually zero.



Schools and other buildings occupied by children need special consideration since children may have a higher lifetime risk than adults of developing asbestos-related disease.

There are a number of key aspects to be considered: 

  • A systematic approach to decision-making is needed in relation to management or remedial measures for asbestos-containing materials in buildings.
  • Consideration must be given to the different types of asbestos-containing building products in terms of their composition, potential for release of fibres during normal use, and fibre type.
  • There is a need to take account of priorities, especially if amphibole asbestos is known to be present.
  • There must be sensible handling and proper control during remedial processes, which must be followed by an adequate inspection. Legislation is needed to ensure that work has been carried out properly.
  • The costs of carrying out certain remedial measures may be high.
  • Reentrainment of asbestos-containing dust to the air must be limited.
  • The handling and disposal of asbestos-containing waste from buildings and during demolition needs great care. Loose, friable, asbestos-containing material should normally be removed from buildings prior to demolition.


It is important to distinguish initially between the different types of asbestos-containing construction products which are, or have been, used in public buildings, since the potential for fibre release from these materials and the need for corrective action varies. Firstly, there are low density, friable or crumbly asbestos-containing materials, such as asbestos-containing sprayed insulation and asbestos-containing pipe and boiler insulation. These materials were used extensively between the 1940s and the 1970s in buildings, principally in North America and Europe. Fibres are most likely to be released when this material is disturbed or when maintenance or renovation work is performed.

The second category of asbestos-containing products used in buildings is hard, high density material, in which the asbestos fibres are firmly embedded in a matrix and unlikely to be released during normal use. Examples include floor tiles, asbestos-cement products, and hard ceiling tiles. Fibres are mainly released from these products during sanding, grinding, cutting or other work during their installation, renovation, removal or demolition.

It is important to follow a logical systematic approach in assessing the type of control action that is required to reduce exposure to asbestos in public buildings. A decision tree model would seem to be particularly appropriate. One such model for friable asbestos-containing materials is presented in Figure 1. Management or remedial action for other types of asbestos-containing materials (i.e. hard materials such as asbestos-cement products) is not normally necessary since these materials rarely present undue risks to the health of the building occupants.

Preventive management programmes for asbestos-containing materials which are not releasing dust can include good record-keeping of their location, labelling of those materials which may be disturbed, public education, periodic re-inspection, and minor repairs. Based on considerations of cost, the possibility that removal may pose a risk to public health if it is not carried out properly, and that workers may be exposed to elevated airborne levels of asbestos during the operation, removal of asbestos-containing materials should be considered only as a last resort unless it can be firmly established that the health risk is unacceptable or cannot be reduced sufficiently by other means. Factors which should be carefully considered before undertaking any removal of friable asbestos-containing materials include:

€  the risk resulting from the removal;

€  the type of occupancy and the most common activities in the building;

€  the accessibility of the material;

€  the protection of other parts of the building against contamination;

€  the replacement of the material;

€  the fire protection requirements of the building;

€  the cost/benefit evaluation of the removal;

€  the availability of properly trained personnel for the remedial action;

€  the need to monitor before, during and after the remedial measures.

If removal of asbestos-containing materials from buildings is undertaken, the method employed should be designed to produce the minimum release of asbestos fibres in the air. The method should not result in increased airborne concentrations inside the building after the action is complete. To minimize potential problems, the control of airborne emissions during removal may be achieved by appropriate technology, including prior wetting of the material with water and surfactant (or equivalent). Dry removal may be the only option in some instances, direct removal by vacuum methods with high efficiency filters (HEPA) being recommended. Wet-wiping of surfaces, followed by HEPA vacuuming after a suitable drying period, is the most suitable method for cleaning non-porous contaminated surfaces.

In the case of building demolition, a decision-tree model is again applicable. In addition, precautions should be taken to avoid undue exposure to anybody living or working in the vicinity during and after the demolition process.



The Working Group discussed two main aspects of this subject: 

  • risks of asbestos-related disease in garage workers and mechanics resulting from inhalation of fibres from friction materials (brake linings and clutch plates);
  • risks to the general public in urban areas resulting from fibre release during the braking of vehicles.

4.1 Occupational risks

In the two available cohort studies of workers in the manufacture of friction products, one of which was conducted in the United Kingdom and the other in the USA, the risks of lung cancer and mesothelioma were very small. Mesothelioma were observed in workers only in a small section of the British factory using crocidolite. Although there have been a few case reports of mesothelioma among garage mechanics (a very large occupational group), there was no excess risk in this group in a systematic case-control survey of mesothelioma in the USA and Canada.

The Working Group concluded, therefore, that provided good work practices were followed and that neither amphibole fibres nor substitute materials with similar potential to cause disease were used in friction products, detectable risks in vehicle maintenance and repair workers are not expected.

However, some agencies have estimated excess deaths associated with exposure to asbestos in this occupational group on the basis principally of exposure-response relationships for lung cancer in several different industries. Since the slope of the exposure-response relationship for lung cancer in friction material production workers is much less than in other production industries, the excess deaths in brake manufacture and repair workers may have been overestimated by this approach.

Appropriate work practices for the maintenance and repair of asbestos-containing friction materials in vehicles include a dry method employing a high efficiency filter vacuum with an enclosure. A less efficient system, but one which can be employed if the vacuum and enclosure are not available, involves the use of liquid cleaning solution applied by spray or brush, together with a drip pan to collect the waste-water. A minimal version of this is a simple wet sponge or brush used to apply a soap solution.

The Working Group recommended that the use of compressed air to clean out brake drums be prohibited, unless it is associated with an enclosure maintained under negative pressure. Also to be avoided is the drilling or grinding of brake linings (often undertaken to correct noisy and/or uneven braking) without proper precautions. These include the use of vacuum hoods, exhaust ventilation and, where necessary, positive pressure or approved filter respirators.

4.2 Pollution of the general environment

The possible emission into the general environment of asbestos fibres during the use of vehicle brakes was reviewed. The very high temperatures generated at the drum-lining interface generally result in destruction of the fibrous nature of chrysotile. Nevertheless, some intact, though usually short fibres, could be released. In areas of heavy traffic or in poorly ventilated tunnels, this could make some measurable contribution to the asbestos fibre content of urban air. On the basis of available data, the extent of this contribution could not be assessed; however, it is probably very small.



The Working Group considered that it was generally appropriate to:

€  remove asbestos-containing material separately with minimum disturbance, where possible;

€  keep surfaces and material damp (using low-foam detergents);

€  avoid creating dust;

€  transport in covered vehicles or bags;

€  bury as soon as possible at a waste-disposal site.

An example of a decision-tree model for disposal of asbestos-containing waste is shown in Figure 2. More detailed information is included in the background paper entitled "Collection, Transportation, Storage and Disposal of Asbestos-Containing Waste".

In some situations and countries, the following aspects may require special attention: 

  • there is a need to define "asbestos-containing waste" (i.e., percentage content);
  • huge volumes of waste may be generated by mining and milling of asbestos;
  • burial under a cover of earth (i.e., landfill disposal) is usually the most appropriate disposal method for asbestos-containing waste, though the appropriate depth of coverage and type of material will vary;
  • possible contamination of water supplies, including those underground in the vicinity of asbestos-containing waste-disposal sites may occur.

To avoid potential future problems, it is important to maintain good records of asbestos-containing waste-disposal sites.

More specifically, the following aspects need to be considered:

  • the selection of appropriate detergents and concentrations to use in water applied to asbestos-containing waste; e.g., some domestic detergents are appropriate; these should be added to water to provide a solution which has a lowered surface tension (e.g., below 35 dynes/cm);
  • the selection of chemical stabilizing agents that form a crust or layer resistant to air and water erosion (e.g., reagents that have a bituminous, resinous adhesive or elastomeric polymer base; one such stabilizer is calcium lignosulfonate);
  • the selection of the types of container for transportation and deposition (e.g., plastic of various gauges, metal, etc.), depending on the nature of the asbestos-containing waste.

In industry, asbestos-containing waste is frequently recycled. However, the recycling of asbestos-containing waste from buildings is not considered desirable, particularly for friable materials and those containing amphibole asbestos.



6.1 Conclusions

The reduction of environmental pollution by respirable asbestos fibres is a desirable public health objective, though the degree of priority afforded to this objective may vary in different countries and under various conditions. Factors which require consideration in establishing this priority include socio-economic circumstances, health and hygiene needs of the population, the availability of engineering skills and equipment, the age-groups at risk and the contribution of smoking to the risk.

As the purpose of population control is the promotion of public health and the prevention of disease - in this case, particularly mesothelioma and lung cancer - the rationale for any control programme is highly dependent on the state of knowledge and interpretation of available data on health risks. The Working Group accepted the importance in this respect of Environmental Health Criteria No. 53: Asbestos and Other Natural and Mineral Fibres, but recognized that there were differences of opinion on certain relevant aspects of exposure-response relationships for asbestos-related diseases. These aspects include the validity of linear non-threshold models and the importance of fibre dimensions, fibre type, and industrial process. To minimize non-productive discussion of these differences, the Working Group concentrated on the definition of some general guidelines and priorities for control that would be appropriate for most interpretations of the health-related data.

The problems which the working group were asked to review were difficult to define, enormously varied and highly technical. It was beyond the scope of a short meeting by a small number of participants, without access to all relevant knowledge, and experience, to draw more than tentative conclusions. The great importance of the problems under review was unanimously accepted and it was strongly recommended that they should be the subject of further comprehensive study and discussion. Even at this stage, however, certain basic principles could be defined. Actions taken to reduce asbestos fibre pollution should be based on full and objective consideration of costs and benefits. A systematic decision-making process has therefore to be followed for each situation and steps need to be taken to ensure that control measures are in fact beneficial. When hazards cannot be adequately controlled, the need to ensure that substitute materials do not present similar risks was recognized.


6.2 General recommendations

  1. Countries that do not have established policies for the control of hazards related to the presence of asbestos in the environment should develop guidelines for this purpose. These should include provisions for cleaning areas where damaged friable asbestos-containing material is present in considerable amounts in public buildings or as a result of uncontrolled disposal practices. Such plans might usefully include management guidance such as decision-tree charts adapted to existing national or local circumstances, requirements, and economic possibilities. Examples of such charts are presented in Figures 1 and 2.
  2. In all situations where asbestos is being handled or manipulated, the guidelines set out in the International Labour Organization handbook "The Safe Use of Asbestos", should be closely observed. Safety in the use of Asbestos - an ILO Code of Practice (International Labour Organization, Geneva, 1984, 129 pp.)
  3. The use of sprayed-on and low density insulation materials containing asbestos should be strongly discouraged on a worldwide basis.
  4. In any given situation, priority should be given to the control of air pollution by amphibole asbestos fibres (crocidolite, tremolite, and amosite). This is not to underestimate the potential adverse health effects of chrysotile fibres.
  5. Priority should be given to the control of potentially hazardous exposures to young children.
  6. The legitimate needs of developing countries for materials for construction, water supplies and sewage control should be recognized. Where asbestos-containing products are used to meet these needs, every assistance should be offered to ensure their safe use.


6.3 Specific recommendations

6.3.1 Asbestos in public buildings

  1. The presence of friable asbestos-containing materials having the potential for fibre release should be identified by inspections and, so far as possible, proper maintenance ensured. In all such buildings, special attention should be given to approved cleaning methods to prevent dust accumulation becoming a source of airborne asbestos.
  2. In situations where fibre release presents a significant risk, repair, encapsulation, or enclosure should be undertaken wherever practicable. Removal should only be considered if there is no satisfactory alternative.
  3. If removal in undertaken, it should be by trained or licensed workers using procedures to ensure their own safety and that of the general public and future occupants. This may require environmental measurement before, during and after the work is undertaken.
  4. When a building is to be demolished, friable asbestos-containing materials should first be removed with priority given to thermal and sprayed insulation.
  5. High-density asbestos products, such as asbestos-cement and asbestos fire-board, in normal condition and use should not create an unacceptable hazard, but care is needed to contain airborne dust during installation and maintenance of these products.

6.3.2 Asbestos Waste Disposal

  1. Friable asbestos-containing waste should be carefully bagged and disposed of, preferably in landfill sites according to well-defined national regulations.
  2. Prior to transportation, friable asbestos-containing waste should be adequately wetted. It should be transported in leak-tight containers in covered vehicles to a disposal site and disposed of in accordance with well-defined national regulations.
  3. Disposal sites should be subject to specific provisions to avoid environmental contamination at any stage during use or after closure.
  4. Demolition debris contaminated with asbestos should be minimized to the extent possible, kept wet, and transported rapidly in bulk to a disposal site.
  5. Asbestos waste should be adequately covered prior to compaction and further covered within the same day that the asbestos waste is deposited at the site. When a disposal site is closed or inactive for a period of over a year, a final cover should be applied sufficient to prevent uncovering of the waste by wind and water erosion.
  6. A surfactant solution (wetting agent) should be used when wetting waste from friable asbestos containing materials prior to removal.

6.3.3 Friction Materials

  1. Poor work practices in the installation and repair of asbestos-containing friction materials can give rise to potentially hazardous levels of exposure. Safe work practices should be promoted and uncontrolled compressed air blowing of brake and clutch debris strongly discouraged.
  2. The use of asbestos-containing friction materials does not pose a detectable risk to the general population. Potential emissions from braking cannot be quantified form available data. Only in tunnels and other very enclosed areas is it likely that adequate ventilation to prevent build-up might be indicated.


This report contains the collective views of an international group of experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Program, the International Labour Organization, or the World Health Organization.


Back to index of publications

International Chrysotile Association © All rights reserved | Contact us