Newsletter archives
Volume 10, Number 1, November 2011
Editorial - The current who policy on Asbestos, No response from the WHO, A review on the WHO's document on the adverse health effects of exposure to Asbestos, New perspective on the Rotterdam convention, Rotterdam convention, Expertise and testimony in American courts, etc
Volume 9, Number 2, November 2010
Scientific Study, An open letter, published in Laval University’s Journal de la communauté universitaire Laval, Asbestos and chrysotile: mixing apples and bananas clarifications in the asbestos debate, The americas are far away from having banned chrysotile, Some court decisions of interest, Mining residue and the environment, etc
Volume 9, Number 1, May 2010
A new group in favour of the safe, responsible and (...), The "any exposure theory", A reply to the often mentioned saying: (...), A successful meeting for the international (...), About mesothelioma cases in mexico, etc
Volume 8, Number 2, November 2009
Letter to the editor of a canadian newspaper (...), When will we have a real comparative study?, Serious support for safe use, End to a publicity campaign (...), The danger of not relying strictly (...), etc
Volume 8, Number 1, June 2009
the asbestos file: a goldmine for the litigation industry!, International conferences on chrysotile, the european commission reviewed derogations on asbestos, large demonstration in favour of the safe use (...), etc
Volume 7, Number 2, December 2008
Chrysotile will not be included in the Rotterdam Convention
Volume 7, Number 1, February 2008
Latest developments regarding the European Union’s asbestos policy
Volume 6, Number 2, June 2007
EDITORIAL - Anti-asbestos Group Excessively Alarmist
Volume 6, Number 1, February 2007
EDITORIAL - Message to the World Health Organization (WHO)
Number 12, Mai 2006
EDITORIAL - Chrysotile : (perspectives)
Number 11, November 2005
May 2006: Chrysotile and Science
The time has come to make the point
Number 10, June 2005
Incidence of mesothelioma : Previsions revisited
Number 9, March 2005
Chrysotile better than PVA
Number 8, November 2004
Chrysotile not included in the Rotterdam convention:
Common sense triumphs over demagoguery
Number 7, August 2004 (.pdf 567kb)
Rotterdam Convention All countries have the right to vote in September 2004
Number 6, April 2004 (.pdf 821kb)
A New Study confirms the difference between chrysotile and amphiboles
Number 5, October 2003 (.pdf 561kb)
Chrysotile in the United States
Number 4, April 2003 (.pdf 666kb)
CSTEE Opinion on Chrysotile and Substitute Fibres: Don’t Confuse Us With Facts, Our Mind Is Made Up
Number 3, November 2002 (.pdf 1.91Mb)
Chrysotile and the catastrophe of the World Trade Center: Myths, reality and a lesson to be learned
Number 2, August 2002 (.pdf 477kb)
Trade unions vision in regard to chrysotile
Number 1, April 2002 (.pdf 1.45Mb)
Great Britain, France, U.S.A.: People are waking up
| 
